香港六合彩中特网

Since the concept of the intermediate band solar cell (IBSC) was proposed in 1997, a significant effort has been made to realise IBSCs with efficiencies that exceed the Shockley-Queisser limit of 31 % [1] and reach the theoretical limit of 63.2 % [2]. However, there have been several challenges in implementing high-efficiency quantum dot intermediate band solar cell (QD-IBSC), namely, thermal decoupling between the intermediate band (IB) and the conduction band (CB), reduction of strain-induced dislocations of QDs, suppression of carrier recombination, and partial filling of IB.

We have demonstrated that thermal decoupling between the IB and the CB can be achieved by wetting layer (WL) removal by depositing AlAs cap layers (CLs) on QDs (Figure 1) [3], introducing a potential barrier between QDs and WLs via Si doping (Figure 2) [4], and enhancing CB offset by hosting QDs within high bandgap material [5]. For suppression of the accumulated strain from the QDs that leads to the formation of threading dislocations, the growth of a high-growth temperature GaAs spacer layer have been demonstrated [7]. Type-II band alignment has also been investigated to reduce carrier recombination a by spatially separating the photo-excited charge carriers [8]. Further work is being carried out in order to achieve partial filling of the IB for strong sub-bandgap photon absorption.

Figure 1(a) External quantum efficiency of InAs/GaAs QDSCs with and without the AlAs CL, and the GaAs reference solar cell.听

Figure 1(b)听Current density vs. voltage curves for the InAs/GaAs QDSCs with and without AlAs CL, and the GaAs reference solar cell under 1-sun AM1.5 illumination [3]

听

Figure 2听Illustrations of charge distribution in the QDs for (a) un-doped QDs and (b) Si-doped QDs, respectively. Schematic diagrams depict the electron relaxation pathways in InAs/GaAs QDSCs for (c) un-doped QDs and (d) Si-doped QDs, where E0 and E1 are the ground and first-excited states, respectively. VWL is the potential barrier formed at the QD and wetting layer interface [4].

听

[1] W. Shockley and H. J. Queisser, 鈥楧etailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p鈥�n Junction Solar Cells鈥�, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 510鈥�519, Mar. 1961.

[2] A. Luque, A. Mart铆, and C. Stanley, 鈥楿nderstanding intermediate-band solar cells鈥�, Nat. Photonics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 146鈥�152, Mar. 2012.

[3] F. K. Tutu, P. Lam, J. Wu, N. Miyashita, Y. Okada, K.-H. Lee, N. J. Ekins-Daukes, J. Wilson, and H. Liu, 鈥業nAs/GaAs quantum dot solar cell with an AlAs cap layer鈥�, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 102, no. 16, p. 163907, Apr. 2013.

[4] P. Lam, S. Hatch, J. Wu, M. Tang, V. G. Dorogan, Y. I. Mazur, G. J. Salamo, I. Ramiro, A. Seeds, and H. Liu, 鈥榁oltage recovery in charged InAs/GaAs quantum dot solar cells鈥�, Nano Energy, vol. 6, pp. 159鈥�166, May 2014.

[5] P. Lam, J. Wu, M. Tang, D. Kim, S. Hatch, I. Ramiro, V. G. Dorogan, M. Benamara, Y. I. Mazur, G. J. Salamo, J. Wilson, R. Allison, and H. Liu, 鈥業nAs/InGaP quantum dot solar cells with an AlGaAs interlayer鈥�, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, vol. 144, pp. 96鈥�101, Jan. 2016.

[6] H. Y. Liu, I. R. Sellers, T. J. Badcock, D. J. Mowbray, M. S. Skolnick, K. M. Groom, M. Guti茅rrez, M. Hopkinson, J. S. Ng, J. P. R. David, and R. Beanland, 鈥業mproved performance of 1.3渭m multilayer InAs quantum-dot lasers using a high-growth-temperature GaAs spacer layer鈥�, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 704鈥�706, Aug. 2004.

[7] F. K. Tutu, I. R. Sellers, M. G. Peinado, C. E. Pastore, S. M. Willis, A. R. Watt, T. Wang, and H. Y. Liu, 鈥業mproved performance of multilayer InAs/GaAs quantum-dot solar cells using a high-growth-temperature GaAs spacer layer鈥�, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 111, no. 4, p. 046101, Feb. 2012.

[8] S. Hatch, J. Wu, K. Sablon, P. Lam, M. Tang, Q. Jiang, and H. Liu, 鈥業nAs/GaAsSb quantum dot solar cells鈥�, Opt. Express, vol. 22, no. S3, pp. A679鈥揂685, May 2014.