Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø

XClose

Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Public Policy

Home
Menu

Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Policy Commission on Communicating Climate Science I

The Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Communicating Climate Science Policy Commission (CCSPC) is an interdisciplinary body comprising experts from academia, policy, environment, business, media and the arts.

time_for_change_pdf_cover_teaser

10 April 2014

The first Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Policy Commission on Communicating Climate Science (I), chaired by Prof Chris Rapley (Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Earth Sciences), comprised a cross-disciplinary project group of researchers from psychology, neuroscience, science and technology studies, earth sciences and energy research - examined the challenges faced in communicating climate science effectively to policymakers and the public, and the role of climate scientists in communication.  

Project information  


Funding Source: Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Public Policy
Year: October 2012 to April 2014

Collaborators

°ä³ó²¹¾±°ù²õÌý

  • Chris Rapley CBE (Chair) – Professor of Climate Science, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Earth Sciences 

°ä´Ç³¾³¾¾±²õ²õ¾±´Ç²Ô±ð°ù²õÌý

  • Dr Chris Brierley, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Geography 
  • Dr James Carney, Social & Evolutionary Neuroscience Research Group, University of Oxford 
  • Dr Richard Clarke, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Institute of Ophthalmology 
  • Ms Anne Haugvaldstad, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø MSc Climate Change 
  • Dr Candice Howarth, Global Sustainability Institute, Anglia Ruskin University 
  • Dr Beau Lotto, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Institute of Ophthalmology 
  • Dr Kris De Meyer, Department of Informatics, King’s College London 
  • Prof Susan Michie, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology 
  • Dr Nick Smith, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology 
  • Dr Michelle Shipworth, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Energy Institute 
  • Dr Jack Stilgoe, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Science & Technology Studies 
  • Prof David Tuckett, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology 
  • Dr Stuart Youngs, Creative Director, Purpose 

Support Team and Special Advisers 

  • Sarah Chaytor, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Office of the Vice-Provost (Research) 
  • Dr Ana Padilla, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Office of the Vice-Provost (Research) 
  • Nicholas Tyndale, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Office of the Vice-Provost (Research) 

About


The Commission explored the role of climate scientists in contributing to public and policy discourse and decision-making on climate change, including how highly complex scientific research which deals with high levels of uncertainty and unpredictability can be effectively engaged with public and policy dialogue.  

The Commission also examined the insights that scientific research and professional practice provide into how people process and assimilate information and how such knowledge offers pathways for climate scientists to achieve more effective engagement.  

Finally, the Commission sought to identify the approaches that climate scientists can adopt to effectively communicate their messages and to make clear recommendations to climate scientists and to policy-makers about the most effective ways of communicating climate science. 

The Commission’s activity included a one-day experimental event, ‘Seeing Yourself See’, with a number of climate scientists to discover how they saw their role and their perspectives on the communication of climate science.   

Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Policy Commission on Communicating Climate Science (I) was supported by Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Public Policy, which seeks to bring Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø's academic expertise to bear on pressing public policy challenges by integrating knowledge and evidence from across disciplines to inform policy.  

Headline findings


  • Communication: There is a need for the general public and climate scientists to engage in constructive dialogue, and for climate scientists to convey a big picture that provides a context for the discussion of new scientific results and their consequences. The authentic and personal voice of climate scientists in this process is essential for the general public to establish trust in the findings of climate science. 
  • Training: Training and development of climate scientists should address strengthening the transparency of the climate science process, and the degree of public participation within it. More specifically, the objective is to equip the community as a whole with the skills to fulfil a range of roles from ‘pure scientist’ to ‘honest broker of policy options’. 
  • Policy: Rather than assuming a role of ‘truth speaks to power’, climate scientists should assume a role of ‘co-production’: where they can contribute their expertise alongside other experts to inform policy formulation and the decision-making process. 
  • Leadership: A professional body for climate scientists should be established to provide a unifying purpose and to offer leadership. 
  • Self-reflection: Active critical self-reflection and humility when interacting with others should become the cultural norm on the part of all participants in the climate discourse. 

Final report: Greening the Recovery (pdf) →

Outputs and impact


  • Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Policy Commission on Communicating Climate Science (I) published a report 'Time for Change?' outlining five key recommendations for professional communities involved in climate science. In addition to the full report a policy briefing was produced. 
  • Short report of the experiential event ‘Seeing Yourself See’ (pdf), held as part of the Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Commission in 2013  
  • A commissioned review of psycho-sociology in the context of psychology and neuroscience ‘Psychosocial Contributions to Climate Sciences Communications Research and Practice’ (±è»å´Ú)Ìý
  • Contributed written evidence to Select Committee, oral evidence to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee as part of the ‘’ and cited by the same committee in their report ‘’.ÌýÌý
  • Developed and delivered training science communication training for NERC doctoral students with an increasing number of universities participating. Â