Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø

XClose

Institute of Advanced Studies (IAS)

Home
Menu

Deriving the paradoxical effects of metalepsis with Nerval, Balzac and Genette

06 March 2024, 3:00 pm–5:00 pm

Title page of Honoré de Balzac's Lost Illusions

A Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø Linguistics Seminar with Daniel Altshuler (University of Oxford)

This event is free.

Event Information

Open to

All | Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø staff | Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø students

Cost

Free

Organiser

Richard Jardine

Location

118 Chandler House
2 Wakefield Street
London
WC1N 1PF

Deriving the paradoxical effects of metalepsis
(A joint work with Dag Haug)

In Gérard de Nerval’s novella, Sylvie, a first-person narrator describes what he sees as he travels, concluding with (1), where the text paradoxically identifies the narration time and the story time:

  1. While the coach is making its way up to the hills, let us piece together the memories of the days when I often visited these parts.

This paradox is related to metalepsis, discussed by Genette (1980). However, he focused on third person narration, viz. (2), from Balzac’s Illusions perdues, which gives the impression of a transgression of an ontological boundary when the narrator suddenly enters the text. 

  1. While the venerable churchman climbs the ramps of Angouleme, it is not useless to explain...

While there is extensive work on metalepsis in literary studies (see, e.g., Fludernik 2003; Matzner & Trimble 2020), we know of only one semantic analysis, by Bücking (2023), who treats metalepsis as a species of copredication, which occurs when a sentence receives a true reading despite prima facie ascribing categorically incompatible properties to a single entity (see, e.g., Liebesman & Magidor 2023). We argue that this analysis cannot account for (1) and propose a new analysis that can account for both (1) and (2), while also doing justice to potential differences in their aesthetic import. In particular, we use tools in Discourse Representation Theory (Kamp & Reyle 1993, Kamp et al 2011) to model (1) as involving the identification of the narration and story time in the scope of a fictional operator (in the style of Lewis 1978). In (2), we propose the paradox arises from narrator accommodation, modelled based on Altshuler & Maier (2022)’s analysis of ‘imaginative resistance’.

In sum, we analyse a phenomenon, metalepsis, that hasn't been discussed in semantics until recently, but is important because it sheds new light on the semantics and pragmatics of paradoxical statements, fiction and narrator accommodation.

Image credit: Title page of '²õÌýLost Illusions, Adrien-Moreau, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

About the Speaker

Daniel Altshuler

Associate Professor of Semantics at Faculty of Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics at the University of Oxford

My primary research interests are in the areas of semantics and pragmatics. The theme of my research is context dependence with the aim of better understanding how compositional semantics interacts with discourse structure and discourse coherence. My research in philosophy of language and philosophy of literature explores how literary discourse motivates particular extensions of dynamic-semantic frameworks. In particular, I have been exploring imaginative resistance with Emar Maier, narrative garden-path with Dag Haug, and narrative frustration with Christina S. Kim.