Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø

XClose

Human Evolution @ Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø

Home
Menu

Bayesian Statistical Analysis dates Homo naledi to 912,000 years of age

13 June 2016

Homo naledi is a recently discovered species of fossil hominin from South Africa.

The Remains of Homo naledi A considerable amount is already known about ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±Â but some important questions remain unanswered. Here a team of scientists report a study that addressed two of them: "Where does ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±Â fit in the hominin evolutionary tree?" and "How old is it?" They used a large supermatrix of craniodental characters for both early and late hominin species and Bayesian phylogenetic techniques to carry out three analyses. First, they performed a dated Bayesian analysis to generate estimates of the evolutionary relationships of fossil hominins including ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±. Then they employed Bayes factor tests to compare the strength of support for hypotheses about the relationships of ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±Â suggested by the best-estimate trees. Lastly, they carried out a resampling analysis to assess the accuracy of the age estimate for ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±Â yielded by the dated Bayesian analysis. The analyses strongly supported the hypothesis that ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±Â forms a clade with the other ±á´Ç³¾´ÇÌýspecies and Australopithecus sediba. The analyses were more ambiguous regarding the position of ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±Â within the (Homo,ÌýAu. sediba) clade. A number of hypotheses were rejected, but several others were not. Based on the available craniodental data,ÌýHomo antecessor, Asian Homo erectus,ÌýHomo habilis,ÌýHomo floresiensis,ÌýHomo sapiens, andAu. sediba could all be the sister taxon of ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±. According to the dated Bayesian analysis, the most likely age for ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±Â is 912 ka. This age estimate was supported by the resampling analysis. The team's findings have a number of implications. Most notably, they support the assignment of the new specimens to Homo, cast doubt on the claim that ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±Â is simply a variant of ±á.Ìý±ð°ù±ð³¦³Ù³Ü²õ, and suggest ±á.Ìý²Ô²¹±ô±ð»å¾±Â is younger than has been previously proposed.

The evolutionary relationships and age of Homo naledi: An assessment using dated Bayesian phylogenetic methods

Mana Dembo, Davorka Radovcic, Heather M. Garvin, Myra F. Laird, Lauren Schroeder, Jill E. Scott, Juliet Brophy, Rebecca R. Ackermann, Chares M. Musiba, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Arne Mooers, Mark Collard

DOI: