Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø

XClose

Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø UCU

Home
Menu

Campaign Archive

In 2012 we campaigned to defend academic values, at Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø these are enshrinedÌýinÌýStatute 18. Mobilisations through formal governance bodies and our formal negotiations persuaded Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø to drop proposals to replace Statutes with a mix of 'Ordinances' and HR processes.

Towards the end of 2010ÌýÏã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø consulted us over the introduction of a pilot 'Rank & Yank' performance management scheme in the biomedical faculty. When Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø refused to listen to our objectionsÌýwe organised a boycott of the pilot schemeÌýand it was quietly dropped.

The dramatic increase in tuition fees in 2010 led to a spirited campaign by students around the country including at Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø whereÌýa student occupation ran for a number of weeks. When Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø proposed a 6% cut to staff numbers across a number of areas in 2009, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø UCU members responded with aÌýcampaignÌýincluding a ballot for local industrial action.ÌýÏã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø eventually agreed to avoid compulsory redundancies and industrial action was averted.ÌýWe also alerted our members to a plan to outsourceÌýemail provision - a staff survey identified widespread opposition to outsourcing and the strategic and technical problems the scheme would likely cause.

Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø started a review of professorial payÌýin 2008 and we ensured that our members concerns were heard during the consultation process.

Proposals to create a 'City Academy' school were published by Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø in 2007.ÌýÏã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø UCU led a local campaign against the Academy proposalÌýand was instrumental in making opposition to the government's Academy initiative AUT policy (the UCU was formed in 2006 from a merger of AUT and NATFHE).

Also in 2007 Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø proposed changes to redundancy pay that would have disadvantaged longer serving and higher paid staff.ÌýÏã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø UCU campaigned against the changes to redundancy payÌýand took a case the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC)Ìýclaiming that the original scheme was a contractual term. The CAC agreed and nearly a year later Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø re-instated the original scheme terms.

A white paper published by Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø in 2005 proposed 15% job cuts over a three year period.ÌýÏã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø UCU organised significant opposition to theÌýproposed 15% cuts which meant that Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÖÐÌØÍø achieved no more than half of the original target (167 posts) - with staff leaving voluntarily and no compulsory redundancies.